Ok this is to explain about my previous post titled Who’s a failure according to google. One of the comments (thanks retard - u no retard lah) was a link to an old news from BBC published in 2003 which reported this incident.
This is not some kind of error on Google’s part but a sort of hooligan-type, “community project” because it involved a lot of people and websites to make this happen.
Let me explain bit by bit for the newbies.
In [tag]Google[/tag], when you click the button “I’m feeling lucky”, you will be taken to the page located at the top of the results, means you trust that google knows what you want and you don’t want to look at all the other results, you just want to go to the page ranked first in the search results.
So how does Google decides who gets to the top of the page?
One of the biggest factor is what they call Page Ranking, where each page has their own ‘popularity’ on the internet by counting on how many websites link to you. They figure, if there are thousands of people link from their websites to yours, then your website must be important. More links to your website, the higher the ranking.
So, using this knowledge, a group of people was determined to push George Bush’s page to the top of the ranking when people searched for ‘failure’. They promoted this idea and asked webmasters to up somewhere on their own website, a short description on failure and link that word to Bush’s page. They spread their propaganda through websites, blogs and IRC rooms.
This is what they call a [tag]googlebomb[/tag] and I think thousands of websites joined in (especially those who are not in favour of Bush’s agenda on war). So that was why when you search for ‘failure’ or ‘miserable failure’ and click on ‘I’m feeling lucky’, you are taken to Bush’s page.
Other googlebomb :
“miserabile fallimento” which means miserable failure in italian, will give you the website of Silvio Berlusconi (Italian Prime Minister).
“anti-war peace protesters” will return a fake error, saying you are looking for “anti-war violent protesters”.
Links :
2003 BBC Report
Feedback by Google on the “failure” googlebomb.
Wikipedia (free encyclopedia) on Googlebomb
[tags]George Bush, Page Ranking[/tags]
7 Responses
Dora Alias
October 20th, 2005 at 1:50 pm
Comment #1
Why must explain???? They are already a FAILURE! don’t waste time lah.
orgkampung
October 24th, 2005 at 4:52 am
Comment #2
There are a lot of ways to become a failure, but never taking a chance is the most successful..
orgkampung
October 24th, 2005 at 4:53 am
Comment #3
go.. go.. bush. kill em’ all.
orgkampung
October 24th, 2005 at 4:54 am
Comment #4
i wonder if bush doesn’t exist. maybe the end of the world will be more nearer.
dick cheny
October 28th, 2005 at 11:32 pm
Comment #5
we dont wont the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud
k szwweney
November 1st, 2005 at 1:56 pm
Comment #6
10/31/05 According to USA Today/Gallup poll 55% of Americans polled said the bush administration was a failure! So Google doesn’t lie.
Jack Spirko
December 7th, 2005 at 2:23 am
Comment #7
Taking all the politics out what this shows is clearly that Google is becomming about useless as a search engine.
Some would say that Bush is a failure some would say Michael More is a failure and they are ranked numbers one and two for the term on Google.
Odds are you fall into one of two camps either you think Moore or Bush is the more accurate as a failure however one thing all of us can agree on is if a surfer goes to any search engine and searches for “failure” they are not looking to find Moore OR Bush they are looking for web pages that actually discuss failure.
While we all have our opinions about Moore (I find him disgusting regardless of my opinion of ANY elected official) and Bush the sites about both of these men do NOT discuss the term failure in any way shape or form.
Clearly the heavy weighting Google assigns to links is hurting the web surfer more then Bush or Moore. This is partly why I feel MSN is poised to really take a big share of the market in the next 24 months.
Jack
http://www.search-engine-positioning-experts.com
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply