Comments on: Why Bush is a failure according to google (explained). http://mrbadak.com/2005/10/20/why-bush-is-a-failure-according-to-google-explained/ anything funny and interesting. pictures, videos, news and links. Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:09:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Jack Spirko http://mrbadak.com/2005/10/20/why-bush-is-a-failure-according-to-google-explained/#comment-379 Jack Spirko Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:23:27 +0000 http://mrbadak.com/blog/?p=149#comment-379 Taking all the politics out what this shows is clearly that Google is becomming about useless as a search engine. Some would say that Bush is a failure some would say Michael More is a failure and they are ranked numbers one and two for the term on Google. Odds are you fall into one of two camps either you think Moore or Bush is the more accurate as a failure however one thing all of us can agree on is if a surfer goes to any search engine and searches for "failure" they are not looking to find Moore OR Bush they are looking for web pages that actually discuss failure. While we all have our opinions about Moore (I find him disgusting regardless of my opinion of ANY elected official) and Bush the sites about both of these men do NOT discuss the term failure in any way shape or form. Clearly the heavy weighting Google assigns to links is hurting the web surfer more then Bush or Moore. This is partly why I feel MSN is poised to really take a big share of the market in the next 24 months. Jack http://www.search-engine-positioning-experts.com Taking all the politics out what this shows is clearly that Google is becomming about useless as a search engine.

Some would say that Bush is a failure some would say Michael More is a failure and they are ranked numbers one and two for the term on Google.

Odds are you fall into one of two camps either you think Moore or Bush is the more accurate as a failure however one thing all of us can agree on is if a surfer goes to any search engine and searches for “failure” they are not looking to find Moore OR Bush they are looking for web pages that actually discuss failure.

While we all have our opinions about Moore (I find him disgusting regardless of my opinion of ANY elected official) and Bush the sites about both of these men do NOT discuss the term failure in any way shape or form.

Clearly the heavy weighting Google assigns to links is hurting the web surfer more then Bush or Moore. This is partly why I feel MSN is poised to really take a big share of the market in the next 24 months.

Jack
http://www.search-engine-positioning-experts.com

]]> By: k szwweney http://mrbadak.com/2005/10/20/why-bush-is-a-failure-according-to-google-explained/#comment-243 k szwweney Tue, 01 Nov 2005 05:56:51 +0000 http://mrbadak.com/blog/?p=149#comment-243 10/31/05 According to USA Today/Gallup poll 55% of Americans polled said the bush administration was a failure! So Google doesn't lie. 10/31/05 According to USA Today/Gallup poll 55% of Americans polled said the bush administration was a failure! So Google doesn’t lie.

]]> By: dick cheny http://mrbadak.com/2005/10/20/why-bush-is-a-failure-according-to-google-explained/#comment-231 dick cheny Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:32:57 +0000 http://mrbadak.com/blog/?p=149#comment-231 we dont wont the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud we dont wont the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud

]]> By: orgkampung http://mrbadak.com/2005/10/20/why-bush-is-a-failure-according-to-google-explained/#comment-209 orgkampung Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:54:10 +0000 http://mrbadak.com/blog/?p=149#comment-209 i wonder if bush doesn't exist. maybe the end of the world will be more nearer. i wonder if bush doesn’t exist. maybe the end of the world will be more nearer.

]]> By: orgkampung http://mrbadak.com/2005/10/20/why-bush-is-a-failure-according-to-google-explained/#comment-208 orgkampung Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:53:09 +0000 http://mrbadak.com/blog/?p=149#comment-208 go.. go.. bush. kill em' all. go.. go.. bush. kill em’ all.

]]>